AMD has been attempting to place a dent in Nvidia’s gaming GPU dominance for years. To date, its makes an attempt — just like the Radeon VII and its new 7nm course of, that are designed to compete with Nvidia’s RTX 2080 — have fallen just a little flat. Now, AMD is setting its sights on Nvidia’s midrange playing cards with its Radeon RX 5700 ($349) and RX 5700 XT ($399). They’re each constructed on AMD’s new RDNA structure, and the large promise is that it could possibly present as much as 1.25x efficiency per clock and 1.5x efficiency per watt in comparison with the Graphics Core Subsequent (GCN) structure that powered its earlier Polaris and Vega GPUs.

Value, efficiency, and energy utilization are key on the $300 to $400 value factors, and AMD is looking for a fragile stability of all three with the RX 5700 collection. To not be outdone, Nvidia has additionally launched its upgraded midrange RTX playing cards: the RTX 2060 Tremendous ($399) and RTX 2070 Tremendous ($499). These playing cards supply modest velocity bumps over the prevailing RTX playing cards they’re changing on the identical value factors. They had been additionally sufficient to drive AMD’s hand to reduce the value of the Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT graphics playing cards simply two days earlier than their launch final month.

That value reduce was massively necessary as a result of if the Radeon RX 5700 XT had debuted at its authentic $449 value as an alternative of $399, then Nvidia’s $499 RTX 2070 Tremendous would have been simply well worth the $50 improve. Because it stands, AMD’s aggressive pricing makes the alternatives on the midrange much more tough, particularly because the RX 5700 and 5700 XT are actually going head-to-head with Nvidia on efficiency.

I’ve been testing Nvidia and AMD’s newest midrange playing cards over the previous couple of weeks, with the intention of discovering a transparent winner for 1440p gaming. Whereas AMD has did not match Nvidia when it comes to efficiency on the excessive finish, competitors on the midrange couldn’t be nearer. The graphics card wars are lastly heating up.


AMD RX 5700 vs. Nvidia RTX 2060 Tremendous evaluate: the competitors is heating up 2

AMD’s new playing cards are each primarily based on the corporate’s 7nm course of, RDNA structure, and use 8GB of GDDR6 graphics reminiscence. AMD is likely to be utilizing a brand new structure right here, however the firm isn’t pushing any actual new {hardware} benefits to utilizing RDNA simply but. There’s no assist for ray tracing or guarantees of AI-powered anti-aliasing. AMD is specializing in uncooked efficiency as an alternative of eye sweet.

AMD’s large structure modifications do imply that the corporate has greater bandwidth reminiscence and enhancements to its compute items. We’ve seen AMD use 7nm for the Radeon VII, however this card was primarily based on the earlier GCN structure. AMD claims that RDNA playing cards could have 50 % higher efficiency than earlier GCN playing cards, which may imply we’ll see some attention-grabbing developments within the high-end of the market quickly.

That 8GB of VRAM is similar quantity discovered on each the RTX 2060 Tremendous and RTX 2070 Tremendous. Nvidia has accomplished little or no when it comes to {hardware} to its upgraded RTX Tremendous playing cards, however there are actually extra uncooked CUDA cores and better clock speeds. Each the RTX 2060 Tremendous and RTX 2070 Tremendous look bodily the identical as their predecessors, although, which suggests they’re very well-built and look nice.

AMD and Nvidia midrange GPUs (2019) specs

SpecsGeForce RTX 2060 TremendousGeForce RTX 2070 TremendousRadeon RX 5700Radeon RX 5700 XT
SpecsGeForce RTX 2060 TremendousGeForce RTX 2070 TremendousRadeon RX 5700Radeon RX 5700 XT
Core clock1470MHz1605MHz1465MHz1605MHz
Increase clock1650MHz1770MHz1725MHz1905MHz
SP compute7.2 TLFOPS9.1 TFLOPS7.9 TFLOPS9.7 TFLOPs
Reminiscence8GB GDDR68GB GDDR68GB GDDR68GB GDDR6
Reminiscence bandwidth448GBps448GBps448GBps448GBps
StructureTuring 12nm TSMCTuring 12nm TSMCRDNA 7nm TSMCRDNA 7nm TSMC
TDP175W215W185W225W
Value$399$499$349$399

Whereas Nvidia moved to a brand new dual-fan setup for its Founders Version RTX playing cards final yr, AMD has caught to its blower-style on its reference playing cards. This appears like an apparent mistake as a result of the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT each run hotter and are approach louder than Nvidia’s RTX competitors in consequence. Blowers have advantages for space-constrained circumstances, however for everybody else, a dual- or triple-fan system shall be much more environment friendly. On the 5700 XT, there’s additionally a dent within the casing, which is designed to enhance airflow, nevertheless it simply finally ends up wanting unusual quite than offering an apparent enchancment to how the cardboard performs.

Each of AMD’s new playing cards additionally assist PCIe 4.0, however you’ll want a brand new motherboard and AMD’s third-generation Ryzen CPUs to see the profit from that proper now. Whereas PCIe 4.Zero doubles the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0, this isn’t actually required at present resolutions and refresh charges, and it’ll turn into much more necessary sooner or later when resolutions push past 4K. In a card designed for 1440p screens, it’s good to have for future-proofing, nevertheless it’s completely pointless. Luckily, it’s backwards appropriate with PCIe 3.0, so you possibly can nonetheless use the 5700 playing cards with present motherboards and CPUs.

I’m genuinely impressed by how nicely each of those new AMD playing cards carry out in 1440p gaming. In Far Cry 5, body charges often exceeded 90 fps on max settings, and the 5700 XT outperformed Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Tremendous and got here near the higher-priced 2070 Tremendous in most of my checks. Nevertheless, I did discover that body charges between the AMD and Nvidia playing cards can range loads relying on the sport.

Future 2 carried out loads higher on each the 2060 Tremendous and 2070 Tremendous than AMD’s 5700 collection when it comes to uncooked body charges, however Division 2 appears to be higher optimized for AMD’s playing cards. I ran each at maxed-out settings, and all the playing cards dealt with nicely. Likewise, the Fireplace Strike Excessive benchmark carried out much better on each the 5700 XT and 5700 than Nvidia’s playing cards. Time Spy ran higher on Nvidia’s playing cards.

AMD vs. Nvidia midrange 2019 benchmarks

BenchmarkGeForce RTX 2060SGeForce RTX 2070SRadeon RX 5700 XTRadeon RX 5700
BenchmarkGeForce RTX 2060SGeForce RTX 2070SRadeon RX 5700 XTRadeon RX 5700
Time Spy8,1719,05380307413
Fireplace Strike Excessive9,78210,7841097410016
Far Cry 587fps96fps94fps87fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider50fps59fps50fps45fps
Division 260fps74fps62fps56fps

I examined all video games with a 27-inch Asus ROG Swift PG279Q monitor (G-Sync disabled) at 1440p decision and max settings. Shadow of the Tomb Raider, a current DirectX 12 title, carried out equally on each the $399 5700 XT and the $399 RTX 2060 Tremendous.

I used to be most stunned with the RTX 2070 Tremendous efficiency, bringing it very near what the usual RTX 2080 can supply. In the event you’re taking a look at spending $699 on the brand new RTX 2080 Tremendous, then I’d positively have a look at the 2070 Tremendous, which has a lot of the efficiency of an RTX 2080 for $200 much less. I briefly examined the 2080 Tremendous, too, and the efficiency beneficial properties over the common RTX 2080 weren’t as vital because the 2060 Tremendous and 2070 Tremendous.

All 4 playing cards appear best for 1440p gaming, even at max settings in trendy video games. You possibly can clearly modify the settings down to enhance body charges for a 144MHz monitor setup or get usable body charges with all the attention sweet enabled.

As with all video games and checks, I’d anticipate each AMD and Nvidia’s playing cards to carry out higher over time as soon as titles are optimized and drivers are tweaked and improved. Even with out that, the efficiency hole within the midrange has positively shrunk, because of AMD’s new playing cards, although.


AMD RX 5700 vs. Nvidia RTX 2060 Tremendous evaluate: the competitors is heating up 5

This surprisingly shut efficiency on the identical $399 value level makes the choice between AMD or Nvidia much more tough. That selection will in all probability come down as to whether you worth much less warmth, much less energy consumption, and loads much less noise out of your PC.

Throughout my testing, each of AMD’s playing cards often exceeded 80C, whereas Nvidia’s playing cards hovered round 73C underneath load. AMD is utilizing a distinct method to measure temperature than Nvidia, which does lead to greater reported temps. However even with that thought-about, the AMD card made the general temperature inside my PC greater than both Nvidia card. Temperature apart, the distinction within the cooling between the 2060 Tremendous and the 5700 XT is night time and day. AMD’s playing cards are noticeably louder than Nvidia’s equivalents, and when you worth a silent PC, then I can’t advocate AMD’s playing cards right here. Nvidia’s cooling means the 2060 Tremendous and 2070 Tremendous keep at comparable noise ranges (when it comes to what you discover) whether or not your PC is idle or pushing out a demanding AAA title at 1440p.

AMD’s RX 5700 XT and 5700 blower spins up virtually instantly right into a sport, and it’s distracting until you’re utilizing headphones. AMD’s playing cards additionally draw much more energy than Nvidia’s new Tremendous line. The RTX 2060 Tremendous has a TDP of 175 watts, whereas AMD’s equally priced 5700 XT attracts as much as 225 watts. The RX 5700 is available in decrease at 185 watts, whereas the $499 RTX 2070 Tremendous has a TDP of 215 watts.

I’m hoping that third-party RX 5700 XT and 5700 playing cards will take care of the noise and warmth state of affairs loads higher than AMD’s reference blower, as they normally include a number of followers. I’d advocate ready on these when you’re impressed by the efficiency beneficial properties however not by the warmth and noise produced or when you’re excited by overclocking these playing cards.


AMD RX 5700 vs. Nvidia RTX 2060 Tremendous evaluate: the competitors is heating up 6

One other consideration would be the options that Nvidia gives with its playing cards in comparison with AMD’s newest. AMD has clearly optimized for uncooked efficiency right here, however Nvidia gives comparable efficiency plus additional options like real-time ray tracing on high. The promise of cinematic results in video games continues to be early days, however Nvidia is investing quite a lot of money and time into getting sport builders to take ray tracing significantly. This has been bolstered, because of the truth that Sony’s next-generation PlayStation and Microsoft’s Mission Scarlett Xbox console will each assist ray tracing.

That ought to imply extra sport builders begin specializing in ray tracing, as each next-gen consoles will assist it. We haven’t seen sufficient video games with ray tracing to actually make it value it simply but, however the promise is there, and with out assist for ray tracing, it does imply AMD’s Radeon 5700 and 5700 XT aren’t precisely future-proof. You additionally miss out on Nvidia’s Deep Studying Tremendous-Sampling (DLSS) that leverages the corporate’s supercomputer farms to scan video games earlier than they’re launched (and even afterwards) and work out essentially the most environment friendly method to render graphics.

AMD does supply Radeon Picture Sharpening to upscale video games with out large body price penalties and Radeon Anti-Lag to enhance aggressive video games, however neither comes near the influence real-time ray tracing has on a gaming expertise. I’ve discovered Battlefield V is without doubt one of the good examples of ray tracing results, because of the reflections on objects and weapons, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider makes use of ray tracing in a lot of shadowy scenes.


AMD RX 5700 vs. Nvidia RTX 2060 Tremendous evaluate: the competitors is heating up 2

The selection between AMD and Nvidia for $399 or under has instantly turn into much more difficult. AMD’s value reduce was brilliantly timed to react to Nvidia’s Tremendous playing cards, and the efficiency guarantees match up. In the event you’re taking a look at spending $400 on a brand new graphics card, you then now have two nice decisions (or a $499 RTX 2070 Tremendous possibility when you’re prepared to spend just a little extra to get even higher efficiency).

If, like me, you worth a cool and quiet PC, then the apparent selection continues to be Nvidia proper now. AMD has actually closed the efficiency hole within the midrange, because of some spectacular value factors, nevertheless it nonetheless has an extended method to go along with its reference playing cards to compete on warmth, energy consumption, and noise.

AMD has laid some necessary and thrilling groundwork with the transfer to 7nm and the RDNA structure. We’re unlikely to see Nvidia transfer to 7nm this yr, so AMD’s new structure is the large new challenger for graphics playing cards in 2019. It’s a problem that AMD has pulled off on the efficiency facet within the midrange. Now, it has to look past the sub-$400 value factors and get much more aggressive on the greater finish of the market to make issues really attention-grabbing.

Pictures by Tom Warren / The Verge

Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These don’t affect editorial content material, although Vox Media could earn commissions for merchandise bought through affiliate hyperlinks. For extra info, see our ethics coverage.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply